نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه الزهرا تهران ایران
2 دکتری پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه آزاد واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
3 کارشناسی ارشد ادبیات نمایشی دانشگاه سوره. تهران ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In comparative studies, philosophical analysis of literary works can be considered as a powerful branch of literary criticism. In the meantime, Nietzsche's system of thought has been able to be placed as an attractive theoretical basis for artistic-literary researches due to his origin and his attitude towards art and drama. Among his theories, the position and concept of action and its relationship with the hero, his desire and will, and the morals of the noble and the lowly under the theory of the superhuman, can lead to very wide results in the narratology and analysis of the philosophy of drama. to result. Therefore, this research aims to, with a descriptive method - and according to Nietzsche's theories on the axes of will, action and man acting and reacting and rereading two Iranian plays, Pahlavan Akbar Mimirad by Baizaei and Amize qalmadoon by Radi, to give a philosophical analysis of why and why the hero and anti-hero in these narratives. The results of this research show that the role of the hero as an active agent in the drama is deficient, and the system of beliefs and traditional values have caused him to appear more in the guise of a victim and an active character, and the narratives are a diagram of the dominance of anti-heroes. It will be on active and passive heroes; And contrary to what is expected from the structural system of the narrative, the heroes are of the lower castes and the secondary characters have the characteristics
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)